Tariff ruling sparks backlash: President Donald Trump has expressed his frustration with a recent ruling by the U.S. Court of International Trade that blocked his tariffs. In a lengthy social media post, Trump attacked the three-judge panel, questioning their judgment and implying they were biased against him. He also blamed the Federalist Society for providing him with “bad advice” on judicial nominations, which he believes led to this unfavorable ruling.
The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled that Trump’s use of emergency powers to impose unilateral tariffs exceeded presidential authority and required Congressional approval. Trump rejected this view outright, defending his tariff strategy and claiming it helped the U.S. collect “trillions of dollars” and bolster national prosperity. According to Trump, the ruling is being “hailed all over the world by every country, other than the United States of America”.
Trump’s frustration with the judiciary is part of a larger pattern of him lashing out at the courts when they rule against his agenda. In his social media post, Trump questioned the judges’ credentials and implied they were undermining his presidential legacy. He stated, “Where do these initial three Judges come from? How is it possible for…”. Trump’s criticism of the judiciary has sparked debate about the limits of presidential power and the role of the judiciary in shaping trade policy.
The court’s decision stated that Trump’s tariffs were unlawful because they exceeded presidential authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The court said such actions require Congressional approval. Trump’s defense of his tariff strategy is based on his claim that it has helped the U.S. collect significant revenue and bolster national prosperity.
The full court will now hear the appeal, with participation from 11 active judges. The Supreme Court may ultimately decide on the matter, determining whether a president can impose tariffs without Congress. This ruling could reshape the future of U.S. trade authority. In fact, a federal appeals court has already issued an administrative stay on the order, intensifying the uncertainty around the levies.
Still on Tariff ruling sparks backlash
Trump’s blame on the Federalist Society for the court’s decision stems from his belief that they gave him poor advice on judicial picks when he was new to Washington. One Trump appointee, Timothy M. Reif, sits on the three-judge panel for the U.S. Court of International Trade. Despite this, Trump is calling for a quick reversal of the ruling.
Would you like to Earn Money Online with just your mobile device?
If yes then click on the link below:
https://earnbean.ng/
