Judge Rules Against Trump: A federal judge has issued a significant ruling in favor of six transgender and nonbinary individuals, ordering the US State Department to allow them to obtain passports with sex designations that match their gender identity. This decision comes despite an executive order from President Trump that aimed to restrict passport sex designations to an individual’s sex “at conception.”
Background on the Policy
The Trump administration’s policy on passport sex designations was introduced on January 2025, Trump’s first day in office. The policy sought to require government-issued identification documents, including passports, to reflect an individual’s sex “at conception.” This move was widely criticized by LGBTQ+ advocates and organizations, who argued that it was discriminatory and would cause harm to transgender and nonbinary individuals.
The Lawsuit
The lawsuit, “Orr v. Trump,” challenges the Trump administration’s policy on passport sex designations. The six plaintiffs, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the ACLU of Massachusetts, argued that the policy denied them dignity and created a barrier for transgender and intersex Americans. The ACLU collected over 214,000 public comments opposing the policy, demonstrating widespread opposition to the Trump administration’s plan.
Still on Judge Rules Against Trump
The Ruling
The judge’s ruling found the Trump administration’s policy likely unconstitutional and in violation of the law. As a result, the State Department must allow the six plaintiffs to obtain passports with accurate sex designations. While the current ruling applies only to the six plaintiffs, they plan to file a motion to extend the preliminary injunction to all individuals affected by the policy.
Implications of the Ruling
The ACLU considers this a significant victory against discrimination and for equal justice under the law. The organization’s statement on the case highlights the importance of this decision, saying it “affirms the inherent dignity of our clients, acknowledging the immediate and profound negative impact that the Trump administration’s passport policy would have on their ability to travel for work, school, and family.”
Key Points of the Ruling
– Temporary Relief: The State Department must allow the six plaintiffs to obtain passports with accurate sex designations.
– Potential Expansion: The plaintiffs plan to seek a broader injunction to include all affected individuals.
– Constitutional Concerns: The judge found the Trump administration’s policy likely unconstitutional and in violation of the law.
The ruling is a crucial step forward for the rights of transgender and nonbinary individuals, and it remains to be seen how the Trump administration will respond to the court’s decision.
Pope Francis Meets Crowds from Popemobile Amid Ongoing Recovery
Would you like to Earn Money Online with just your mobile device?
If yes then click on the link below:
https://earnbean.ng/
